Many Worlds Interpretation
*partial pages, under construction
The Many-Worlds interpretation, proposed by Everett in 1957, hypothesises that there is no collapse of the wavefunction at the moment of observation. Brief details of the theory are given in the
Lazy Layman's Guide to Quantum Physics. The following links are to discussions of the detail of how an MWI 'multiverse' would work:
This site contains the following discussion pages:
Causation, and the relationship between universes
Discussion of the concept of self, measure, and rational behaviour, under MWI
What is the MWI and where does it stick its neck out?
What are the moral implications of MWI, if any? *
How does MWI compare with Copenhagen and Time Reversibility? *
The Weak Anthropic Principle *
Why I Like MWI
If we start from the corrected Cogito Ergo Sum - i.e. something like
'something is therefore something is', we can take the next step and say
'there is differentiated stuff' or 'There are many things'. If we then take
another short step and say 'There are Infinitely many things', we arrive at
MWI. I can't believe anything could be more parsimonious. This relates
directly to Tegmark's idea that the universe contains no information.